<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spotted 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://end-grain.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://end-grain.net/?p=930</link>
	<description>A wood Type and Letterpress blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 14:35:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://end-grain.net/?p=930&#038;cpage=1#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 04:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://end-grain.net/?p=930#comment-92</guid>
		<description>The ink is cleaned off the block, but leaves pigment deep in the grain of the wood. Occasionally I also see wood type that has been proofed in green -- usually a Martha-Stewarty sea foam green.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ink is cleaned off the block, but leaves pigment deep in the grain of the wood. Occasionally I also see wood type that has been proofed in green &#8212; usually a Martha-Stewarty sea foam green.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://end-grain.net/?p=930&#038;cpage=1#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://end-grain.net/?p=930#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Yes, they are completely cleaned of ink, but the tint remains embedded deep in the grain of the wood, especially with oil-based inks. I also see green type a lot: usually a Martha-Stewarty sea foam shade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, they are completely cleaned of ink, but the tint remains embedded deep in the grain of the wood, especially with oil-based inks. I also see green type a lot: usually a Martha-Stewarty sea foam shade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bethany Heck</title>
		<link>http://end-grain.net/?p=930&#038;cpage=1#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Bethany Heck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://end-grain.net/?p=930#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Wow Glenn, I did not know that! That is really fascinating. So did they clean the red ink off completely, or did they leave it on the block?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Glenn, I did not know that! That is really fascinating. So did they clean the red ink off completely, or did they leave it on the block?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://end-grain.net/?p=930&#038;cpage=1#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://end-grain.net/?p=930#comment-89</guid>
		<description>I think it was once common practice to pull a red proof with a brand-new set of type. The residual tint provided better contrast as the type aged and helped the press operator easily spot any problems with toning/coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it was once common practice to pull a red proof with a brand-new set of type. The residual tint provided better contrast as the type aged and helped the press operator easily spot any problems with toning/coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
